What do you see from the picture
In the past few years, the internet has given us The Dress , a photo of a mysterious missing leg , and this disorienting floor design. Michelle Dickinson , a nanotech engineer, posted the optical illusion on Twitter in January In the video, Kemakolam starts by holding her left hand up to the camera, with her open palm facing the camera. After that, she wraps the fingers of her right hand around the palm of her left hand. Kemakolam then pushes both hands toward the camera, during which her right hand seemingly breaks free and appears, balled up into a fist, in front of her left hand in seconds.SEE VIDEO BY TOPIC: 15 ILLUSIONS THAT WILL TEST YOUR BRAIN
SEE VIDEO BY TOPIC: What You See First Reveals Unexpected Truth About YouContent:
- Test your eyes with this image: Which 4 numbers do you see?
- How can we help you?
- The First Thing You See in the Picture Can Reveal Your Character
- How many ducks are in the picture? The viral challenge sweeping the internet, explained
- Things You Cannot Unsee (and What They Say About Your Brain)
- Whatever You See First In This Image Will Determine What Type Of Person You Really Are
- 40 mind-boggling optical illusions that have stumped the internet
- Fun Test: What Do You See First? What You Choose Says A Lot About Your Current Situation
- What do you see in this picture? The answer says a lot about your personality
Test your eyes with this image: Which 4 numbers do you see?
To me it looks like a pair of pirouetting wolves. Others in the Independent office suggested a butterfly and one forensically inclined colleague thought it was a pelvis. Whatever you see, it could just open a window on your soul. For decades, psychologists have used the Rorschach ink blot test to provide them with an idea of the sort of person you are.
They show you a random pattern — the ink blot — ask you what you see and record your response. From that, the theory goes, they can construct a picture of how your mind works, and what may be wrong with it. Now a Canadian doctor has spoilt the fun by posting on Wikipedia the 10 ink blot images used by Herman Rorschach, the Swiss psychiatrist who developed the test in And, in a move that has angered psychologists even more, he has posted alongside the images the commonest responses they evoke.
Critics have besieged Wikipedia protesting that this is tantamount to publishing the answers to exam questions before anyone has sat the exam. It risks invalidating one of the oldest psychological tests in use.
The test is based on 10 standard ink blots created by dropping a blob of ink on a sheet of paper, folding it over and opening it up to create a symmetrical image. Of the 10 blots used, some are black and white, some red and white and some multicoloured. The subject is shown the images and invited to say the first thing that comes into their head about what they suggest.
Later, the psychologist takes them back over the images, inviting them to say why they responded in the way they did. Tony Black, a psychologist who has used the test, said: "It tells you something about how people respond emotionally. The images are composed of two symmetrical halves, so people often say they see a moth or butterfly with its wings.
But then you get those who pick out a little area or feature and tell you a great deal about it. You can see what use they make of their imagination, how they see the world around them and what importance they attach to what they see. You can tell something about their initiative and ingenuity based on how they expand on different parts of the blot, or whether they stick to the whole thing.
Ersatz versions of the Rorschach test are available online for party games but Mr Black said the genuine test was always administered in person by the psychologist, so they can observe how the subject responds and explore the reasons with them.
If they say bats or butterflies, it is shape. He was taught the technique as a trainee psychologist in the late s in Liverpool and later used it on patients at Broadmoor high security mental hospital, where he was the first head of psychological services. The results were not very helpful. Today, he is sceptical of the value of the test, which takes time to administer and yields few insights that cannot be obtained more simply from modern personality questionnaires and interview techniques.
I disapprove of giving out details of the test. The British Psychological Society would haul you over the coals. James Heilman, an accident and emergency doctor from Moose Jaw, in Canada's Saskatchewan province, responded to the debate by posting all 10 images at the bottom of the article about the test, along with what research had found to be the most popular responses for each.
Explaining his provocative move, he told The New York Times: "I just wanted to raise the bar — whether one should keep a single image on Wikipedia seemed absurd to me, so I put all 10 up. The debate has exploded from there. The 10 images have previously appeared on other websites but it was because they were being publicised by the highly popular Wikipedia that psychologists became concerned. Bruce Smith, the president of the International Society of the Rorschach and Projective Methods, said: "The more test materials are promulgated widely, the more possibility there is to game it Dr Heilman was unrepentant.
He said the dispute was about control and compared calls for the ink blots be removed to the Chinese government's attempt to control information about the Tiananmen Sqaure massacre. He pointed out that the standard Snellen chart used for eye tests, which begins with a big letter "E", is readily available on Wikipedia and no one complains about that.
You could get into an accident. Should we take it down from Wikipedia? My dad fooled the doctor that way. The Wikipedia website says that outlines of the 10 official ink blots were first made publicly available in the book Big Secrets by William Poundstone. They are also in the public domain under US copyright law, based on when they were first created and published before It is unknown how easily someone might study the ink blots and fool a psychologist into giving a wrong diagnosis.
You can find our Community Guidelines in full here. Want to discuss real-world problems, be involved in the most engaging discussions and hear from the journalists? Start your Independent Premium subscription today. Independent Premium Comments can be posted by members of our membership scheme, Independent Premium.
It allows our most engaged readers to debate the big issues, share their own experiences, discuss real-world solutions, and more. Our journalists will try to respond by joining the threads when they can to create a true meeting of independent Premium. The most insightful comments on all subjects will be published daily in dedicated articles. You can also choose to be emailed when someone replies to your comment.
The existing Open Comments threads will continue to exist for those who do not subscribe to Independent Premium. Due to the sheer scale of this comment community, we are not able to give each post the same level of attention, but we have preserved this area in the interests of open debate. Please continue to respect all commenters and create constructive debates.
Long reads. Coronavirus Advice. Lockdown Guide. UK Politics. Lib Dems. Green Party. Boris Johnson. Jeremy Corbyn. US Politics. Help The Hungry. Shappi Khorsandi. Mary Dejevsky.
Robert Fisk. Mark Steel. Janet Street-Porter. John Rentoul. Matthew Norman. Sean O'Grady. Tom Peck. Andrew Grice. Rugby union. US sports. Miguel Delaney. Streaming Hub. Geoffrey Macnab. Clarisse Loughrey. Ed Cumming. Royal Family. Tech news. Tech culture. The Competition. Money transfers. Health insurance. Money Deals. Voucher Codes. Just Eat. National Trust. Climate Blogs. UK Edition.
US Edition. Log in using your social network account. Please enter a valid password. Keep me logged in. Want an ad-free experience? Subscribe to Independent Premium. View offers. What do you see here? Download the new Independent Premium app Sharing the full story, not just the headlines Download now.
How can we help you?
Account Options Connexion. Version papier du livre. John H.
People in lockdown across the UK have been kept entertained over the past few weeks with several social media trends popping up online. The tricky puzzle asks you to look at a picture of ducks and you have to figure out how many of them appear in the image. At first glance, there appear to be nine ducks in the picture, but on closer inspection there are more hiding. If you look very carefully, you can spot five ducks in the first row, six in the second row and five in the final row. There are some small ducks in the picture, but it might be difficult to notice them when you first take a look at the image.
The First Thing You See in the Picture Can Reveal Your Character
An autostereogram is a single-image stereogram SIS , designed to create the visual illusion of a three- dimensional 3D scene from a two-dimensional image. In order to perceive 3D shapes in these autostereograms, one must overcome the normally automatic coordination between accommodation focus and horizontal vergence angle of one's eyes. The illusion is one of depth perception and involves stereopsis : depth perception arising from the different perspective each eye has of a three-dimensional scene, called binocular parallax. The simplest type of autostereogram consists of horizontally repeating patterns often separate images and is known as a wallpaper autostereogram. When viewed with proper convergence, the repeating patterns appear to float above or below the background. The well-known Magic Eye books feature another type of autostereogram called a random dot autostereogram. One such autostereogram is illustrated above right. In this type of autostereogram, every pixel in the image is computed from a pattern strip and a depth map.
How many ducks are in the picture? The viral challenge sweeping the internet, explained
With the ever-increasing popularity of the internet and social media nowadays, it is easy to spend hours on our mobile phones and laptops. If you ever suspect that your vision might have gotten worse, why not test your vision with this eye test. As many people comment on how accurate it is, it is not a surprise to see the eye test has been making rounds on social media recently. It may not be precise but at least you know that you will need to see your ophthalmologist as soon as possible if you do not get the answer right! When the eye test went viral on the internet, many people felt that their answers truly reflected their eyesight.
Our brains process millions of bits of information a second from what your eyes see, to interpret what you are seeing. A good optical illusion takes advantage of this process of your brain, and flips things around to reveal things about yourself that can only be discovered through the split second decisions your brain makes, when first looking at an image. Each image below is created to target a different part of your personality. This will help shed light on many different aspects of your psyche, and give you a better understanding of yourself.
Things You Cannot Unsee (and What They Say About Your Brain)
To me it looks like a pair of pirouetting wolves. Others in the Independent office suggested a butterfly and one forensically inclined colleague thought it was a pelvis. Whatever you see, it could just open a window on your soul.SEE VIDEO BY TOPIC: 11 Optical Illusions That'll Reveal Your Personality Type
Look closely at this image, stripped of its caption, and join the moderated conversation about what you and other students see. By The Learning Network. May 11, Look closely at this image, stripped of its caption, and join the moderated conversation about what you and other students see. May 4, Look closely at this image, stripped of its caption, and join the moderated conversation about what you and other students see. April 27, Look closely at this image, stripped of its caption, and join the moderated conversation about what you and other students see. April 20, Look closely at this image, stripped of its caption, and join the moderated conversation about what you and other students see.
Whatever You See First In This Image Will Determine What Type Of Person You Really Are
Take a look at this image. Do you see the face of a young woman? If so, great. So do many other people. This may sound like a strange request, but take another gander at the photo, and look closer. You may notice something extra in the picture this time. Take a look at the woman's ponytail.
40 mind-boggling optical illusions that have stumped the internet
Fun Test: What Do You See First? What You Choose Says A Lot About Your Current Situation
What do you see in this picture? The answer says a lot about your personality